Synthetic Cortex · Gen 1 · Cognitive architecture

Thinking,re-architected.

Synthetic Cortex is an external cognitive architecture that wraps a language model and decides how it thinks: which memories surface, which distant concepts are pulled together, when to reason step by step and when to stop. Not a bigger model. A better-organised one.

L1 · shippedL2 · shippedM1 (L1.5) · shipped on mobileGen 1 · in active development
00 — The system

Signal path, end to end.

Every input crosses this map before a language model writes a single word. Tap any node. Lime lines carry the main signal, cyan lines carry emotional state. Red nodes were closed by the agent that prepared this page; dashed nodes are branches not yet disclosed.

Signal flowEmotional stateRedacted by agentUndisclosed branchScroll sideways on small screens →
01 — The pipeline

One input. Dozens of parallel processes. One denser context.

A conventional chat model receives text and predicts text. Everything it can use in a given moment has to fit inside its context window, and what gets into that window is usually decided by recency or keyword similarity. Synthetic Cortex inserts a regulatory pipeline between the input and the model.

Stage 01

Affect scoring

Every input — a message, a letter, a behavioural signal — is scored on three continuous axes: valence, arousal and dominance. No emotion labels, only coordinates.

Stage 02

Neurochemical state

Those coordinates drive a 13-channel synthetic neurochemical state. Channels push and suppress each other, carry momentum from earlier turns, and are pulled back toward balance by a homeostatic regulator.

Stage 03

Threshold gates

The state acts as a field of thresholds. Crossing one fires a process: an associative sweep, a memory consolidation cycle, a selective-perception pass, a self-review, a deep pattern inference.

Stage 04

Context synthesis

What the processes return is compressed into hidden context, the model's sampling behaviour is tuned to the current state, and the output re-enters the pipeline as a new stimulus.

The loop never really stops. Inputs shift the state; the state shapes the reply; the reply shifts the state again, and that shapes the next input. Between turns, background processes keep working: records are broken into fragments, linked to each other, consolidated or forgotten, and re-weighted by how emotionally intense they were when they arrived. What reaches the model at the end is not a longer prompt. It is a more selective one.

See the full flow, including the parts we keep closed, on the architecture diagram.

02 — What it changes

From statistical recall to regulated thought.

Synthetic Cortex does not feel. It is a mathematical model of what the brain does while feeling: the filtering, prioritising and gating that emotion performs on cognition. The aim is the same kind of outcome the brain reaches — fast, contextual, occasionally surprising decisions — reached through a different substrate.

Emotions narrow the options. Logic justifies the choice.

Associative intelligence

It retrieves what is related, not only what is near.

Similarity search returns the records closest to a query. Associative recall also brings in records that belong to the same broader area — close in meaning but not directly on topic — whenever there is room in the context. Spreading activation across a graph of fragments lets one memory call up others.

Expected outcomeAnswers that connect topics you never placed side by side.

Emotional intelligence, computed

Priority is decided by state, not frequency.

The neurochemical state determines what is salient and what fades. Among similar records, an emotional recall ratio works alongside semantic similarity, so the most emotionally significant memory near a topic comes forward first — and a reactive state processes the same input more strongly than a calm one.

Expected outcomeResponses that weigh what matters in this context, not what is statistically common.

Context-window economics

Same window, more signal.

Output quality depends on how much meaningful information fits in the context window. Instead of padding the prompt, the cortex pre-selects and densifies: concepts that sit far apart in the model's geometric meaning space are brought into the same window through associative context management. Pre-computed emotional baselines mean the system rarely recalculates from scratch.

Expected outcomeFewer tokens wasted on raw text, more of them spent on relationships.

Controlled creativity

Two noisy processes, one coherent output.

An affective process and a logical process are each capable of irrational deviations on their own. Integrated, they constrain each other: associative sweeps widen the field, homeostasis and logic narrow it again. Creative expansion fires only when thresholds are crossed — neither constant randomness nor rigid determinism.

Expected outcomeUnexpected connections that still hold together.

Surfacing latent knowledge

A model knows more than it says.

Knowledge inside a language model lives in dense "token ecosystems" that are reachable only along certain paths. Ordinary prompting keeps hitting the statistically dominant ones. By changing the path — what enters the context, and from which associative and emotional angle — the cortex reaches regions of the model's own knowledge that normal prompting leaves dormant.

Expected outcomeRare patterns in the training data become reachable again.

Time as an ingredient

It learns slowly, on purpose.

Information moves through layered memory — short-term, transitional, long-term — is consolidated when it proves useful or emotionally strong, and is forgotten under a homeostatic budget, leaving a trace behind. The architecture trades instant recall for depth of integration.

Expected outcomeThe longer it runs, the further its outputs move away from a raw model's.

03 — Scale of the cortex

Not one network. An ecology of them.

Each module can be developed, replaced or switched off on its own, yet every module listens to the same neurochemical state. That shared state is what turns a collection of components into one system.

Neurochemistry

13

coupled hormone and neurotransmitter channels

Spiking networks

10

spiking neural networks — three core, seven hybrid

Inference hierarchy

14

stacked layers across Equalia and the deep layers

Parallel spaces

2

manifolds — one for meaning, one for emotion

Memory tiers

3

short-term, transitional, long-term — each with forgetting

Hidden context

12+

channels feeding the model what it was never explicitly told

04 — The family

Synthetic Cortex, Gen 1.

Three builds are complete. They share the same idea and differ in how deeply they can reach into a model.

L1Gen 1
Shipped

The first and simplest layer. Synthesises a neurochemical state and uses its weights to trigger processes — tool calling, hidden-context injection and module activation.

L2Gen 1
Shipped

The main system and the most comprehensive build. Attaches to open models and works inside inference: latent-space manipulation and activation steering, driven by weights read from the model itself.

M1= L1.5
Shipped · mobile

The mobile cortex. Designated L1.5, it is in practice the leanest build in the family: many features were removed and others re-engineered so the whole cortex runs locally on a phone. Small on-device models stand in for what L2 does inside a model.

GEN 1 IN DEVELOPMENT
Status

Gen 1 is still being built.

L1, L2 and M1 are the first three milestones, not the finish line. Research tracks for internal learning, manifold geometry, default-mode dynamics and cultural resonance continue inside Gen 1. Gen 2 is planned.

L1 ✓L2 ✓M1 ✓Phases 2 · 5 · 6 · 7 →Gen 2
05 — First product

Generation Network.

The first product built on Synthetic Cortex. Generation Network runs the M1 mobile cortex on the phone itself: your Reflection — a digital copy built from your letters, chats and in-app behaviour — synthesises its own neurochemical state, consolidates memories while the phone is idle, and learns to resemble you over weeks rather than minutes.

Personal mental models stay on the device by default. That constraint shaped the whole M1 build: everything had to be light enough to run locally.